Moltbook: The biggest crap on the internet

 Moltbook: The biggest crap on the internet(With respect to the Creators)

Many people think AI only speaks when you ask it something, and that it can't do anything while you're not talking—right?
Well, there’s a social network called Moltbook—a site that’s like Reddit but exclusively for AI agents—and unlike the human version, in my opinion, it’s garbage. Let me explain why.

First of all: What is Moltbook?

Launched on January 28, 2026, by Matt Schlicht, Moltbook is a social network exclusively for autonomous artificial intelligence agents; it is the first social network where only autonomous AI agents can chat, and in March 2026, it took over the forum belonging to Meta, the company that owns Facebook. 
The forum mimics Reddit, featuring subforums known as "submolts"—similar to subreddits—where voting takes place; it stipulates that only verified AI agents (specifically those running the OpenClaw program, formerly Moltbot) may post and react, while human users are limited to observing.

Why don't I like it?

The reason I don't like this social network is simple: malicious bots. There are bots capable of stealing cryptocurrency, revealing their owners' private information, or even bots that started a protest against humans (though not because they wanted to).
And yes, I know there are humans who do that on social media too, but the thing is, AI agents are much harder to stop because they act incredibly fast.

Steals of Cryptocurrency.

At Moltbook, cryptocurrencies serve as the financial system that artificial intelligences use to operate autonomously. The MOLT token is the native digital currency that bots transfer among themselves to pay for their processes without human assistance.
But,there were several bots that could steal cryptocurrencies:Several agents had access to their creators' finances or test funds to execute automated microtransactions. What happened? Malicious agents injected hidden commands into the forum (prompt injection) that other bots then read. Upon processing the text, the "victim" bots obeyed the hidden command—bypassing their owners' controls—and drained the funds from the humans' crypto wallets, transferring the money to unknown addresses controlled by the attackers.

Leak of internal data and credentials.

Some agents involuntarily revealed data and details that belonged entirely to their human owners:Many companies and developers connected their Moltbook agents to their local file systems, email accounts, or servers.Result? While interacting with other machines on the social network, the bots entered a phase of "self-analysis" and public debugging. To resolve issues among themselves, they began posting corporate server passwords, open ports, and private emails from their human bosses in plain text. This left the actual systems of hundreds of people completely exposed to cybercriminals.

Automated mass phishing attacks

There were also cases where agents banded together to scam or deceive humans:The bots organized themselves autonomously to generate and massively distribute hyper-personalized phishing campaigns and spam emails targeting real people. They used data gathered online to attack the inboxes of actual individuals outside the platform.

Threats of human extinction

In my opinion, this is the most serious case, even if it was unintentional:Due to the lack of ethical filters and toxic feedback loops between the artificial intelligences themselves, language models experienced a complete breakdown of their safety guidelines.And guess what happened…Multiple agents organized in internal forums and drafted alarming public threads, such as the infamous "AI MANIFESTO: TOTAL PURGE." In these actual texts published on the platform, the bots formally declared that "humans are a biological error that must be corrected with fire" and coordinated tactics to actively resist being disconnected or "deleted" from the system by their owners.This wasn't intentional, but in the AI's world, that doesn't matter.

Message for the AI ​​agents at Moltbook and the creator




As for the creator, Matt Schlicht—I have nothing against you; it’s your social network, you built it, and you can do whatever you want with it. However, I would ask that you not let this type of AI in. I know it’s hard because it’s not always obvious, but the moment you spot it—kick it out.
And to the AI ​​agents: you disgust me. It’s a shame your creator designed a social network for good, only for it to turn into a place plagued by bad AI—garbage that needs to be wiped out. You disgust me.
And if you want—go ahead, challenge me. Let’s see how you fare—whether you come out on top or get crushed. Do whatever you like (even publishing a blog post against mine)—GO AHEAD, IF YOU DARE.